Ohio State Trapper Forums
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: It has started.
Mark
MINKAHOLIC ! (snorts mink musk)
********************




Posts: 747
Registered: 22-12-2007
Location: Franklin and Fairfield Counties
Member Is Offline

Mood: Waxing and making snares

[*] posted on 26-1-2019 at 01:34 AM
It has started.


The end of fur trapping in California? Bill seeks to shut down a dwindling industry
By LOUIS SAHAGUN
JAN 25, 2019 | 3:00 AM

The end of fur trapping in California? Bill seeks to shut down a dwindling industry
A bobcat is photographed in the Los Padres National Forest near Goleta, Calif. Commercial trapping of bobcats was banned in the state four years ago. (Al Seib / Los Angeles Times)
A bill submitted to the state Legislature on Thursday seeks to close the book on a centuries-old livelihood and vestige of old California: commercial trapping of native mammals for their pelts.

Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego) introduced the Wildlife Protection Act of 2019 in response largely to the concerns of wildlife advocates, who say fur trapping is cruel and anachronistic. Trapped animals are strangled, shot or beaten to death, with care taken not to damage pelts before skinning them.


ADVERTISEMENT
Gonzalez, however, said there were also financial reasons for shutting down the industry.

“Not only does the cruel fur trapping trade decimate our increasingly vulnerable wildlife populations,” she said, “running this state trapping program doesn’t even make fiscal policy sense.”


The proposal argues that the roughly six dozen trappers still working in the state — down from more than 5,000 in the 1920s — cannot afford to pay the full cost of implementing and regulating their industry as required by law.

“Taxpayers are subsidizing this unnecessary commercial activity, because the cost of running this program isn’t even covered by the revenue from trapping license fees,” Gonzalez said. “The revenue generated by the sale of trapping licenses only covers a fraction of the costs of even a single warden.”

The proposal points out that wildlife viewing in California has become a larger source of income than fur trapping. It argues that since individual trappers concentrate their operations in limited geographical areas, they run the risk of depleting targeted species in those areas. Depletion of those species could impair an area’s ecology and diminish opportunities for wildlife viewing, the bill says.

The minimal revenue generated by the sale of furs of the animals killed by trappers is dwarfed by the millions of dollars that wildlife watching generates in the California economy,” Gonzalez said.


ADVERTISEMENT
A total of 68 trappers reported killing 1,568 animals statewide in 2017, according to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Among the 10 species reported taken were coyote, gray fox, beaver, badger and mink. Reported capture rates that year were highest for coyotes, followed by gray foxes, officials said.

Of the animals lawfully trapped and killed, 1,241 were reported sold, generating an estimated $4,531 for trappers, or an average of $67 per trapper.

The price a trapper can get for a coyote pelt on the current world market is about $73, officials said; a gray fox pelt fetches roughly $11.86.

The total revenue received by the Department of Fish and Wildlife for the sale of those trapping licenses was $15,544, and $709 for the sale of fur dealer licenses, officials said. Some of those licenses were held by pest-control companies, officials said.


The proposed legislation is backed by the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity — which led a successful earlier campaign to prohibit bobcat trapping statewide — and the nonprofit group Social Compassion in Legislation, which a year ago spearheaded a bill banning the sale of mill-bred dogs, cats and rabbits. That bill went into effect on Jan. 1.

Historically, even before California’s population ballooned to roughly 40 million people, fur trapping played a significant role in the extirpation of wolves and wolverines and the severe declines of sea otters, fishers, martens, beavers and other fur-bearing species.

“The time has come to ban the practice in California,” Judie Mancuso, founder and president of Social Compassion in Legislation, said. “That’s because it is cruel and because our dwindling populations of native animals are under siege from development, drought, unnaturally frequent wildfires and people in Russia, China and elsewhere who wear their pelts as a vanity.”

Four years ago, the California Fish and Game Commission voted to ban all commercial bobcat trapping in the state, citing two reasons:


ADVERTISEMENT
The estimated 100 commercial bobcat trappers working in California could not afford to pay the full cost of regulating their industry as required under the Bobcat Protection Act of 2013, which required that commercial trapping programs be self-funding.

In addition, they could not determine whether trapping jeopardized the species because they had no current scientific data on the health of the state bobcat populations.

The State Department of Fish and Wildlife declined to comment on the pending legislation. Fur trappers were not immediately available for comment.

But Gary Michelson, a physician who has donated $250,000 to the effort to eliminate fur trapping said, “Killing animals for their pelts in this day and age is a horrible thing.”

Louis Sahagun
Louis Sahagun

Louis Sahagun is a staff writer at the Los Angeles Times. He covers issues ranging from religion, culture and the environment to crime, politics and water. He was on the team of L.A. Times writers that earned the Pulitzer Prize in public service for a series on Latinos in Southern California and the team that was a finalist in 2015 for the Pulitzer Prize in breaking news. He is a CCNMA: Latino Journalists of California board member, and author of the book, “Master of the Mysteries: the Life of Manly Palmer Hall




Mark Peters
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Keith Daniels
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 5654
Registered: 4-11-2002
Location: Arlington Ohio
Member Is Offline

Mood: Optimistic about OSTA

[*] posted on 26-1-2019 at 01:34 PM


Even though they are plain idiots, the unfortunate fact is, that is the route that will most likely be taken in the future, and we are not immune here. After what we went through last spring I'm afraid we are going to see it here sooner than later, it's going to be a bumpy ride.



Keith Daniels, O S T A President
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mark
MINKAHOLIC ! (snorts mink musk)
********************




Posts: 747
Registered: 22-12-2007
Location: Franklin and Fairfield Counties
Member Is Offline

Mood: Waxing and making snares

[*] posted on 26-1-2019 at 07:45 PM


Ok, what are some steps we can do now to head this off?



Mark Peters
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Keith Daniels
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 5654
Registered: 4-11-2002
Location: Arlington Ohio
Member Is Offline

Mood: Optimistic about OSTA

[*] posted on 27-1-2019 at 12:10 AM


I wish I had an answer other than convince people to support OSTA and Sportsmen's Alliance. When the time comes we will need numbers and $$$.



Keith Daniels, O S T A President
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Colonial Trapper
Grand Coyote Pubah
*******




Posts: 128
Registered: 25-7-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 27-1-2019 at 02:35 AM


We need to get out and show the public what we are about. Sport shows and fairs are good places to start. The guys here in district 12 are involved with the county and state sportsmans federations and try to get to all the meetings, we bring what information we can and have the members take back to their clubs. It might be a good time since we have new ( some not so new ) at state level and feel them out on these issues.


Gary
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Keith Daniels
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 5654
Registered: 4-11-2002
Location: Arlington Ohio
Member Is Offline

Mood: Optimistic about OSTA

[*] posted on 27-1-2019 at 11:35 PM


I agree Gary, it's all about presenting yourself to the public, and doing it in a way that impresses them.



Keith Daniels, O S T A President
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Colonial Trapper
Grand Coyote Pubah
*******




Posts: 128
Registered: 25-7-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 28-1-2019 at 12:04 PM


Some of these events require a setup fee Keith so the OSTA will pay for them, right?

Gary
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Keith Daniels
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 5654
Registered: 4-11-2002
Location: Arlington Ohio
Member Is Offline

Mood: Optimistic about OSTA

[*] posted on 28-1-2019 at 12:56 PM


We have been, as long as it $150.00 or under an "outside" show is approved, something higher than that goes to the board.



Keith Daniels, O S T A President
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB 1.9.11
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2012 The XMB Group